Do you want to get an expert evaluation of your website or advertising?
In the modern world, the reputation of a medical institution on the Internet is one of the key factors for success and attracting new patients. Positive reviews, high ratings, and active interaction with patients on online platforms can form the basis of trust in the clinic, while negative comments and ignoring feedback often lead to loss of clients. A comprehensive approach to reputation management not only helps to increase loyalty but also improves the institution's image, which is especially important in the conditions of high competition in the medical field.
85% of users trust reviews as personal recommendations.
72% of patients read reviews before choosing a clinic, which affects the number of appointments.
Reputation questions for medical organizations have their own specifics, as patients make decisions based on the level of trust in the institution and feedback from other people. In this context, reputation management includes several key aspects:
Monitoring reviews and ratings. Constant tracking of mentions about the clinic on various platforms, including Google, social media, and specialized review websites.
Handling negative reviews. Timely response to negative comments, demonstrating care for patients and readiness to address shortcomings.
Attracting positive reviews. Encouraging customers to leave feedback after a successful visit.
Online presence management. Creating and maintaining official pages and profiles on popular platforms where patients can ask questions and leave comments.
We are monitoring mentions on social media and forums.
We are conducting an analysis of positive and negative reviews.
Identifying current reputation trends.
Collecting data on ratings and frequency of mentions.
We apologize for any inconvenience you may have experienced. Thank you for bringing this to our attention, we will do our best to address the issue and improve our service. Your feedback is valuable to us.
Helping patients navigate complex situations.
Correcting inaccurate data and responding to errors.
Creating surveys to gather patients' opinions.
Setting up notifications for patients.
Selecting loyalty programs based on reviews.
Showcasing achievements and positive experience.
Creating real cases of successful treatment.
Evaluating reputation based on territories.
Comparing with competitors based on key performance indicators.
Determining the percentage of satisfied patients.
Identifying weaknesses for improvement.
Maintaining and improving reputation requires the use of a variety of tools and techniques. Among the most effective methods are:
Monitoring social networks and forums. Studies show that 72% of users read reviews before contacting a medical institution, and timely tracking of reviews helps prevent reputational risks.
Working with opinion leaders and expert doctors. Involving reputable doctors in cooperation can increase patients' trust in the clinic.
Creating informational content. Regularly updating the blog and social media platforms to highlight the clinic's achievements and events improves the perception of the institution and generates interest.
Using analytics and feedback to improve the quality of service. Collecting feedback and analyzing it helps not only improve the service but also demonstrate attention to patients, which is crucial for increasing loyalty.
Managing the online reputation of a medical institution allows solving several tasks at once and brings tangible benefits
Building trust. Consistent online presence and working with reviews strengthen trust in the clinic.
Attracting new patients. Positive reviews attract the attention of potential clients, increasing the number of appointments.
Mitigating reputational risks. Promptly responding to negative comments helps avoid serious reputational losses.
Increased loyalty. Satisfied patients are more likely to recommend the clinic to their acquaintances.
Improving positions in search engines. Positive mentions and activity on the Internet contribute to improving search positions.
When assessing the effectiveness of managing the reputation of a medical institution, the following metrics can be used:
NPS (Net Promoter Score): indicates the level of patient satisfaction by showing the percentage of those who are willing to recommend the clinic.
Clinic rating: the average score on review platforms should be no less than 4.5 to maintain trust.
Number of positive reviews: an indicator can be the proportion of positive reviews at 80% and above.
Response time: it is considered effective to respond to a negative comment within 24 hours.
A comprehensive approach is the best way to improve the clinic's image. It is important not only to promptly respond to feedback, but also to work on creating and maintaining a positive image of the institution. This may include preparing and publishing educational materials, showcasing the clinic's achievements and activities, as well as engaging in feedback to understand patients' needs.
Respond to reviews and handle complaints, maintain communication with patients.
Developing materials showcasing the clinic's achievements.
Evaluate the level of reputation, identify key issues and growth areas.
They manage the clinic's social media accounts, increasing loyalty.
This is work with reviews, mentions, and feedback, as well as creating a positive image online.
Google, social networks, and review websites are the main platforms for reputation.
Monitoring tools are used to track mentions and reviews.
Key metrics include clinic rating, NPS, and the number of positive reviews.
Visible improvements usually appear within 2-3 months.
You can contact the platform moderators to have them removed.
Data on mention frequency, rating, and sentiment of reviews are used.
A positive reputation helps attract new patients and build trust with existing ones.
It is best to respond promptly with understanding and offer assistance.
Encourage patients to leave reviews and remind them to do so after their visit.
Deletion is only possible in case of a serious violation of the platform's rules, but it is better to work with the review.
The process involves analysts, targetologists, and review managers.
Preferably, especially on negative ones, to show care for the patients.
You can work on improvements, respond to feedback, and showcase changes.